Cases 31 - 40 of 1,619
Herman Morris, Jr. v. Andrew Tyner, et al
as 23-13996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW TYNER, J.K. PRUITT, TIMOTHY C. WARD and others
USA v. Pierre Marc
as 23-13955
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PIERRE C. MARC
Christopher Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL SANDLIN, M. C. DAWKINS and others
Son Vuong v. William Hall, Jr., et al
as 23-13737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SON THI VUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR., JOSHUA C. CANTON, TERRY P. LEWIS and others
Elias Santos Siqueira, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13710
Petitioner:
ELIAS ALVES-DOS SANTOS SIQUEIRA, MARIA C. RIBEIRO-ALVES and LIGIA RIBEIRO-CHAVES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Bard, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13540
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID KLINE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. BARD, RODERICK BATES, JR., ELENA BAZILIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
USA v. Charles Adams, et al
as 23-13537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES C. ADAMS and CHARLES C. ADAMS, M.D., P.C.
Nathan Floyd v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13482
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN C. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
