Cases 41 - 50 of 466
David Adams, et al v. Palm Beach County
as 23-11065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ADAMS, MICHAEL SHAW and GERALD KASMERE
Defendant / Appellee:
PALM BEACH COUNTY
Aishly Foy v. Sheriff of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al
as 23-11302
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AISHLY FOY
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM ENNIS, KATELYN PAYNE, DAVID AGEE and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Nadya Diaz v. Adam Hames, et al
as 23-11209
Petitioner / Appellant:
NADYA IVETTE DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM MARSHALL HAMES, MATTHEW KYLE WINCHESTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Adam Swindle
as 23-11659
Petitioner:
In re: ADAM SHANE SWINDLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lena Lindberg v. Kevin Oaks, et al
as 23-11254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENA MARIE LINDBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN OAKS, Police Officer, in official capacity, JOE PINSKER, Police Officer, in official capacity, JAMES ADAMS, Detective, in official capacity and others
Lee Adams v. M. Todd, et al
as 23-10908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE F. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. TODD, M. THOMPSON and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 23-11379
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
ROBERT B. ADAMS, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
William Adams, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-11344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, BRADY BAKER, Individually and on behalf of the Next of Kin of John C. Baker, DIETRICH MOORE, Individually and on behalf of the Next of Kin and Estate of John Bush and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
