Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,305
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff: ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant: DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Diane Williams, et al
as 24-10475
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: DIANE WILLIAMS and RALPH A. WILLIAMS
Oliver Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10479
Petitioner: OLIVER D. WILLIAMS
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Patricia Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10463
Petitioner: PATRICIA WILLIAMS
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
David Sussman v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 24-10442
Plaintiff: DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, a.k.a. El Maestro
Defendant: SHEVAUN HARRIS, in their official capacity, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter Wellpath), DONALD SAWYER, Corporate Vice President at Wellpath, supra. and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. FCC Forrest City Warden, et al
as 24-10452
Plaintiff: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant: FCC FORREST CITY WARDEN, BLAIR, RANDLE and others
USA v. Charlie Williams
as 24-10431
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHARLIE WILLIAMS
Fair Fight, Inc. v. Catherine Engelbrecht, et al
as 24-10372
Plaintiff: FAIR FIGHT, INC.
Defendant: CATHERINE ENGELBRECHT, DEREK SOMERVILLE, MARK DAVIS and others
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
USA v. William Spearman
as 24-10300
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN
Marsha Mignott v. State Bar of Georgia Foundation, Inc., et al
as 24-10327
Plaintiff: MARSHA W. MIGNOTT, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant: STATE BAR OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION, INC., STATE BAR OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL and WILLIAM V. HEARNBURG, JR., In His Official Capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?