Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Casey Ates v. Iris Arnold, et al
as 15-14372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY ATES
Defendant - Appellee:
IRIS ARNOLD, Parole Officer, Dublin, GA, KEY MCGUIRE, Police Chief, Cochran, GA, WARDEN, Department of Corrections and others
:
SERVICE
Arnold Johnson v. Boyd, et al
as 15-13820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD, KILEY JOHNSON, CARLOS JONES and others
Jermaine Arnold v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-13407
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERMAINE ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jennifer Arnold Rogers v. City of Orlando, Florida, et al
as 15-13198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER R. ARNOLD ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, a Municipal corporation and RUDY RODRIGUEZ, in his individual capacity
Noel Arnold v. USA
as 15-13231
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOEL ARNOLD
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Alan Lopez
as 15-12860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN ARNOLD LOPEZ
Casey Ates v. Iris Arnold, et al
as 15-12756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY ATES
Defendant - Appellee:
IRIS ARNOLD, Parole Officer, Dublin, GA, KEY MCGUIRE, Police Chief, Cochran, GA, WARDEN and others
Christopher McDaniel v. Bradley Arnold, et al
as 15-11818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JORDAN MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY ARNOLD, Individually and in his capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Barrow County, Georgia, SHAYNE HUNNICUTT, Individually and in his capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Barrow County, GA and JOHN DOES, 1 TO 10
USA v. Adam Arnold
as 15-10483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADAM ARNOLD
USA v. Arnold Clayton
as 14-14279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD CLAYTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
