Cases 61 - 70 of 86
David Spencer v. Bradfield, et al
as 13-14645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADFIELD, SIS, Lt., FCC Coleman USP I, PROFFIT, SIS, Lt., FCC Coleman USP I, ADAMS, Lieutenant, FCC Coleman USP I and others
Randy Spencer v. Warden, Holmes CI, et al
as 13-13909
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY LAVERN SPENCER
Respondent - Appellee:
HOLMES CI WARDEN, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and CHAIRMAN, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
USA v. Milton Spencer
as 13-10077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MILTON ALPHONSO SPENCER, Custody
Randy Spencer v. Warden, et al
as 13-10017
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY LAVERN SPENCER
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, TENA M. PATE and WARDEN
Randy Spencer v. Warden, et al
as 12-16369
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY LAVERN SPENCER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and TENA M. PATE, Chair of the Florida Parole Commission
Carey Spencer, et al v. Public Storage, Inc.
as 12-15522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAREY SPENCER, SUSAN SPENCER and JOSHUA SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLIC STORAGE, INC.
James Spencer v. Bob Riley, et al
as 12-13844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB RILEY, in his individual and official capacity, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, CYNTHIA DILLARD, in her individual and official capacity and others
USA v. Spencer Saint-Eloide
as 12-13162
Petitioner - Appellant:
SPENCER SAINT-ELOIDE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Daniel Dumonde
as 12-12633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL LAFFITE DUMONDE, a.k.a. Daniel Laffite Dumonde, a.k.a. Paul Moore, a.k.a. Danny, a.k.a. Daniel Spencer, a.k.a. Daniel Pruitt Spencer
Spencer Campbell v. Staton CF Warden, et al
as 12-12406
Petitioner - Appellant:
SPENCER CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
STATON CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
