Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,099
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11090
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Margarita Rodriguez-Bonilla v. Wayne Ivey, et al
as 23-11005
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARGARITA RODRIGUEZ-BONILLA and MARGARITA BONILLA
Defendant / Appellee: WAYNE IVEY, KELLY HAMAN, GEORGE FAYSON and others
Tomas Miko v. Vernon Jones
as 23-10839
Plaintiff / Appellee: TOMAS MIKO
Defendant / Appellant: VERNON JONES
Richard Rivera v. Rosemary Jones-chambliss, et al
as 23-10816
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD JUSTIN RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee: ROSEMARY JONES-CHAMBLISS and GARY SILVERMAN
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Andrew Joseph, Jr. v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 23-10739
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW JOSEPH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD CHRONISTER, HENRY ECHENIQUE, MARK CLARK and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Gregory Lane v. Mayor of Eatonville, Florida, et al
as 23-10700
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY R. LANE
Defendant / Appellee: MAYOR OF EATONVILLE, FLORIDA, ROBERT L. JONES, WASHINGTON and others
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee: PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Alvin Stanley v. Whitentin, et al
as 23-10629
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant / Appellee: WHITENTIN, BARNETT, SPIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10537
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?