Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dennis Scott, et al v. City of Daytona Beach, Florida
as 23-13119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS SCOTT, CHAD DRIGGERS, DOUGLAS WILLIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA
Joshua Money v. Warden of Johnson State Prison, et al
as 23-12940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ISAIAH MONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF JOHNSON STATE PRISON, WARDEN OF GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION STATE PRISON, VILLEGAS and others
Johnny Bullock v. Walter Berry, et al
as 23-12652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER BERRY, LUMPKIN, SANFORD and others
Edward Rowland, Jr., et al v. Polk County, et al
as 19-14263
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBBI AKINS, as a Polk County Police Badge #837 and individually, JOSH SMITH, in his official capacity as a Polk County and individually and POLK COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BECKY CRAWFORD and EDWARD ROWLAND, SR.
In re: Rowland Jadusingh
as 17-10471
Petitioner:
In re: ROWLAND WASHINGTON JADUSINGH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Rowland v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-13403
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS L. ROWLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICHARD N. DORAN
Rowland Zellars v. Scott Crickmar
as 14-12307
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROWLAND ZELLARS
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT CRICKMAR
Steven Baer v. Rowland Sapp, et al
as 12-15701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN BAER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROWLAND SAPP, Officer and PAUL ABEL, Captain
Osprey Special Risks Ltd., et al v. Barry Rowland
as 12-13895
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OSPREY SPECIAL RISKS LTD., a foreign corporation and GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (U.K.) PLC, a foreign corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BARRY A. ROWLAND, individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-11213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
