Cases 1 - 10 of 56
In re: Joel Horta Suarez
as 23-13088
Petitioner:
In re: JOEL ALBERTO HORTA SUAREZ
Respondent:
IRS, BOND, THE BOND (1080 BRICKELL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED and others
Sheldon Hutchins v. Billy Clark Bail Bonds INC, et al
as 23-10077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BILLY CLARK BAIL BONDS INC, BILLY CLARK, MATT MCKEEHAN and others
Justin Laster v. City of Atlanta, et al
as 22-13639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, KEISHA LANCE BOTTOMS, FELICIA MOORE and others
Charles BondsIn re: Charles Bonds
as 22-12884
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES EUGENE BONDS
Respondent:
USA
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
James BondIn re: James Bond
as 22-11869
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES LOUIS BOND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glenn Francis v. Thomas Scarantino, et al
as 22-10886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN FRANCIS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SCARANTINO, Warden, LORI D. PALMIERI, Court Appoint Counsel, MARK J. O'BRIEN, Court Appointed Counsel and others
Phyllis Edwards v. Dothan City Schools, et al
as 22-10858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHYLLIS EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOTHAN CITY SCHOOLS, DOTHAN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, MICHAEL SCHMITZ and others
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Christopher Brogdon, et al
as 21-14192
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., As Trustee for $3,160,000 The Med Clinic Bd, City of Mgm-1976 E 1st Mortg Rev Bonds (Oaks Partners 2 LLC Proj), Series 2010A and $590,000 The Med Clinic Bd, City of Mgm-1976 E 1st Mortg Rev Bonds (Oaks Partners 2 LLC Proj), Tax
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER F. BROGDON, CONNIE B. BROGDON and BROGDON FAMILY LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
