Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'EL v. State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11825
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA LICENSE #060588618 and others
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Lillie Middlebrooks v. City of Macon - Bibb County Georgia, et al
as 24-10705
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON - BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L. WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
Vanessa Phillips v. Macon Bibb County Government
as 22-10930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VANESSA A. PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Adrian Ezell v. Warden, et al
as 21-13286
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADRIAN MAURICE EZELL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, BIBB COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
