Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. James Braddy
as 19-12823
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES BERNARD BRADDY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAndre Braddy v. Melton, et al
as 17-11534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANDRE BRADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELTON and BAPTISTE
DAndre Braddy v. P. M. Hunter, et al
as 17-10269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANDRE BRADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
P. M. HUNTER, classification, JEFFREY MCCLELLAN, M.D. HERRING and others
DAndre Braddy v. Melton, et al
as 17-10112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANDRE BRADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELTON, Classification and BAPTISTE, Lieutenant
DAndre Braddy v. Labibadi, et al
as 16-17763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANDRE BRADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
LABIBADI and CARTER
Olivette Coffey, Jr., et al v. Dwight Braddy, et al
as 15-11112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVETTE COFFEY, JR., HARRY J. JOHNSON, NANCY J. BRACKETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT BRADDY, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida, J. C. DEKLE, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville, Florida, WILLIAM HALLOWES, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida and others
:
SERVICE
Cecil Howard v. Braddy, et al
as 14-13980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL HOWARD, a.k.a. Alonzo Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADDY, Officer, Riverbend Correctional Facility, WEST, LT, Riverbend Correctional Facility and GLENN, Officer, Riverbend Correctional Facility
Luther Braddy v. Florida Department of Correcti
as 13-12745
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUTHER BRADDY
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jane Doe v. Kaye Braddy, et al
as 10-15879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, (a Pseudonym), as Parent, Next Friend, and Natural Guardian of JOHN DOE (a Pseudonym), a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
KAYE E. BRADDY, JANET E. ENGLISH, JULIE MCCLUNG EVANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
