Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 175
USA v. Corey Gaddy
as 24-11725
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: COREY GADDY
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant: ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Corey Bright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10833
Petitioner: COREY Q. BRIGHT
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Darwin Quinn, et al v. Roland Powell, et al
as 24-11414
Plaintiff: DARWIN QUINN and MITCHELLE'L SIUM
Defendant: ROLAND POWELL, p.k.a. Lil Duval, RICH BROKE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and COREY DENNARD, p.k.a. Mr. Hanky
Corey Schirod Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 23-13583
Petitioner / Appellant: COREY SCHIROD SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Corey BerryIn re: Corey Berry
as 23-13310
Petitioner: In re: COREY DURAN BERRY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wolfgang Halbig v. Lake County, Florida, et al
as 23-11875
Plaintiff / Appellant: WOLFGANG W. HALBIG
Defendant / Appellee: LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA, SHERIFF, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ELLORY OSTERBERG and others
In re: Corey Heard
as 23-12186
Petitioner: In re: COREY BERNARD HEARD
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
USA v. Corey Griffin
as 23-11577
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: COREY DION GRIFFIN
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee: PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?