Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Tiffany Wingo, et al v. Branson Harris, et al
as 24-10933
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY WINGO, KIEARA WINGO, ERIKA WINGO and others
Defendant:
BRANSON HARRIS, CHARLES GORDON, PAUL WILKERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Anesh Gupta v. Attorney General, et al
as 24-11296
Plaintiff:
ANESH GUPTA
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR, CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Timothy Reeves v. Shay Hatcher, et al
as 24-10063
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, PERRY, FIELDS and others
Gregory Fields v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-12896
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY KAZON FIELDS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
George Fields v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11677
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE L. FIELDS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Angela Nails v. Napier Field Police Department, et al
as 23-10473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAPIER FIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR NAPIER FIELD and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11378
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stefan Fields v. Warden, et al
as 22-11083
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEFAN FIELDS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
