Cases 1 - 10 of 352
Randy Capehart v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 24-11795
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE CAPEHART
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES, WHEELER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Georgette Thornton v. Smokes, et al
as 24-10559
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
SMOKES, PULASKI SP WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Michael Brown v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
as 24-10690
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN BROWN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jonathan Guyton v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
as 24-10532
Petitioner:
JONATHAN GUYTON
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Willie James Pye v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10793
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES PYE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
John Canning v. Trevonza Bobbitt, et al
as 23-13992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNING
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOSH WICKER, DEIDRA EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Kwane Dozier v. Warden, et al
as 23-13468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KWANE TYREE DOZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
