Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Frederick Ford v. Anthony Parker, et al
as 24-11748
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ANTONIO FORD
Defendant:
ANTHONY PARKER and TRAVIS YIELDER
USA v. Travis Smith
as 24-11460
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TRAVIS LAMONT SMITH, a.k.a. Hound
Christopher Mathews v. Gregory Ackerman, et al
as 24-11057
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAVAR MATHEWS
Defendant:
GREGORY ACKERMAN, TRAVIS PARRIGIN, MICHAEL CORDERO and others
Travis Cunningham v. Volusia County Correctional Center, et al
as 24-10399
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
VOLUSIA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and HARGRAVE
Travis Cunningham v. Volusia County Correctional Center, et al
as 24-10297
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
VOLUSIA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and HARGRAVE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Bard, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13540
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID KLINE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. BARD, RODERICK BATES, JR., ELENA BAZILIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Philip Krause v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP KRAUSE, VALENCIA GARRETT, ANA MONDRAGON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT and COMMON CAUSE
Not Classified By Court:
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE
Travis Moya v. City of Alpharetta, et al
as 23-13275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS MOYA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ALPHARETTA, CHIEF OF POLICE, ALPHARETTA, R. A. SPLAWN, Alpharetta Police Lieutenant and others
USA v. Travis Anderson
as 23-13186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS LAVON ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
