Cases 31 - 40 of 142
BARKER v. FERRER et al
as 5:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BARKER
Defendant:
ALBERTO FERRER, RICHARD GATLIN, RANDY GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECBI WARNER LLC et al v. TOMS et al
as 5:2021cv00148
Defendant:
CLIFFORD HOLMES, KEVIN LASHLEY, THOMAS RANDALL TOMS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON ALSOBROOK, eCBI Warner, LLC, JERRALD RECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOMAN et al v. OSMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00053
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, CORRECTHEALTH-BIBB, LLC, GEOFFREY OSMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOMAN, ELLEN ENGLISH and BONNER GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2021cv00051
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BRIAN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2021cv00031
Defendant:
JUNE LANE, BRIANNA VINSON, JACINDA KINIG and others
Plaintiff:
LARIEL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAJORITY FORWARD et al v. BEN HILL COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
MAJORITY FORWARD, GAMALIEL WARREN TURNER, SR. and DEBRA LEWIS
Defendant:
DAVID WALKER, DIANE SCRIMPSHIRE, CINDI DUNLAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. BISHARA et al
as 1:2020cv00230
Defendant:
MS LAURA BARBER, BETTY ANN JOHNSON, STATE OF GEORGIA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE E SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
