Cases 31 - 40 of 405
BURROUGHS et al v. HILL et al
as 5:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS and SHEILA DENISE BURROUGHS
Defendant:
HILL, FOSTER, STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ATLANTA et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ATLANTA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. HAYSLIP et al
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
CLERK TARA HAYSLIP, CLERK CONNIE TAYLOR, SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. LAMB et al
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
DAVID S KING
Defendant:
LEWIS LAMB and SHERIFF ERIC D BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Defendant:
CHIEF UNIT MANGER STEVEN DUPREE, UNIT MANAGER EUGENE SAPP, WARDEN HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. WINHEIM
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
DESHAUN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
DAVID WINHEIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
DAVID C HARRIS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. SPANN
as 3:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
LOUIS DAVID JONES
Respondent:
Warden JAMES C SPANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. PERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID WILSON, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, JESSICA DEAN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
