Cases 31 - 40 of 130
COLLINS v. HAMBRICK et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Defendant:
PAT BIEGLER, KATINA DAVIS, Warden H DWIGHT HAMBRICK and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHARLES COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BISHOP v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES H BISHOP and JAMES HAROLD BISHOP, JR
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 5:2019cv00504
Respondent:
CYNTHIA H CLANTON and OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
Petitioner:
TEZ BEN EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. BURKE et al
as 3:2019cv00110
Defendant:
DAVID PHILLIPS, TARA LATIMER MURPHY, ANTHONY CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DELANE HARRIS, JR and VICTOR DELONE HARRIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTIS v. MASSEE et al
as 5:2019cv00452
Defendant:
CHAIRPERSON EMILY DAVIS, SHERIFF WILLIAM MASSEE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERRY N MASSEY and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SHARP et al
as 7:2019cv00149
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
P SMITH, DIXON, H COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCQURTER v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
MR BRADFORD, UNIT MANAGER ALLES, DR WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H MCQURTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLSMAN v. BAILEY et al
as 3:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN H BAILEY, JR and JIMMY WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00034
Defendant:
JERRY REED, NORMAE BEECHAM, Warden H DWIGHT HAMRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE EDWARD JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 5:2019cv00054
Defendant:
MARK TAYLOR, LIEUTENANT LESTER, ANGELA GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
JAY JUNIOR AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
