Cases 1 - 10 of 24
PIERCE v. EDWARDS
as 7:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
ANTRAVENO J PIERCE
Respondent:
JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIERCE v. EDWARDS et al
as 7:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
ANTRAVENO JAROD PIERCE
Defendant:
Chief Judge JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR, Judge ELLEN GOLDEN, KIMBERLY FUKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. COCHRAN et al
as 5:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SENTALE PIERCE
Defendant:
JOEL COCHRAN, AUSTIN SHELTON, MAJOR MARK MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
DEONTRE WILLIAMS, DEANDRE LOWE, Samuel Sanders and others
Cross Defendant:
Inmate PAUL L. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. MYERS et al
as 7:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
Warden MYERS, Deputy Warden MARCUS, Deputy Warden DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), HOLLOMAN, CROSS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIERCE v. CLIFTON, et al
as 7:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
JASON CLIFTON and JAMIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. Prine et al
as 7:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
Chris Prine and UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HASTY et al
as 7:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
MELANIE HASTY and Travis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Pierce et al
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
James M Martin
Defendant:
M. Linda Pierce, William Smith, Raymond Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
