Cases 1 - 10 of 104
CONNOR v. MITCHELL
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
TONY L CONNOR, MOSES ROBERSON, KELVIN KING and others
Defendant:
Commander LARRY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOHN OR JANE DOE, P A WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. KING et al
as 5:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN TAVARES KING and LT KRAUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. MASON et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
JENNIFER MASON, DIXON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOE JAMES, DOOLY STATE PRISON MEDICAL UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A KING
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, LOUIS SCHOFILL and JOHN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASS v. WHITTINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS and CALVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGHAM, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, ANN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BOWEN
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
TELVIN BOBBY KING
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DEMETRIUS SCOTT
Defendant:
SHERMAN THOMAS, DANIEL L KING, RODERICK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
