Cases 31 - 40 of 26,468
ASHLEY v. SHEPPARD
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SINCALIR ASHLEY and JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY
Defendant:
STAN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 4A et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4A, JANE DOE 4B and MINOR DOE 4
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Defendant:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK, FREDDIE HAUGABROOK, DEPUTY DREYFUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. CORZO
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL PARKER
Defendant:
ISMAEL CORZO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
