Cases 1 - 10 of 709
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
JERRY HALL
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. FITZGERALD et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
DEWAYNE RENARD FITZGERALD, STATE COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, SHARELL F LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and BIBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Defendant:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK, FREDDIE HAUGABROOK, DEPUTY DREYFUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PALM v. CORRCARE INC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PALM
Defendant:
CORRCARE INC, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTER v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF THEODORE JACKSON and PAUL BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
