Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen Agnone , Enzo Agnone , Douglas Porcelli and others
Defendant:
Camden County, Georgia , Willis R. Keene, Jr. , Jimmy Starline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker v. Booker et al
as 2:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Tucker
Defendant:
Allen Booker, Ryan McNeal, Jerome Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hickman v. Hickman et al
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Hickman
Defendant:
Nathaniel Hickman, Natalie Thomas, Jason R. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Lynn et al
as 2:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Catherine Browning and Catherine Browning
Defendant:
Paul Lynn, Paul Lynn, Alan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers et al v. Bowman et al
as 1:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Dustin Myers, Dustin Myers, Dustin Myers and others
Defendant:
Murry Bowman, Wiley Clark Evans, IV, Charles Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Crews et al
as 6:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jerome Clarke
Defendant:
Debbie Crews and Andrew M. Magruder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Montogomery County Board of Education et al
as 3:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowman, Christopher Bowman, Christopher Bowman and others
Defendant:
Montogomery County Board of Education and Dale Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
