Cases 151 - 160 of 107,790
Custis v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Custis, Sr.
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia and Shaqueil Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Dimitri et al
as 1:2024cv21574
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Dimitri and MDC Childrens Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Caplan v. Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60677
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. and MKZ Davie Commerce 2, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Machado v. Brannan et al
as 8:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Machado
Defendant:
David Brannan, Winter Haven Police Department and City of Winter Haven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
