Cases 21 - 30 of 107,361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morin v. Alliance TSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Nicklas Morin
Defendant:
Alliance TSP, Inc., Stacey Eaton and Carlos Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv22144
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company Corporation, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company Corporation, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc. Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Caplan v. PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22137
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as PPG PAINTS and May Property Acquisitions LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barberi v. Julio & Sons Tires Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv22135
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Julio & Sons Tires Corp. and Perrine 9911 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
