Cases 11 - 20 of 1,329
Adams v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00751
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Plaintiff:
Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Kelli Adams and Warden Gregory Sampson
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Whittle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Defendant:
OFFICER HILBERT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECT HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM COLT RAMEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barwick v. Cumbie et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Defendant:
Wheeler Core Civic and Captain Adam Cumbie
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew McLendon v. Teodoro, et al
as 24-12083
Defendant:
ADAMS, ELLINGTON, BARNER and others
Plaintiff:
DREW BARRY MCLENDON
BURNSIDE v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION and ADAM SUTTON
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DARRON BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Adams v. Brenda Forman, et al
as 24-12054
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT and BRENDA FORMAN
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS ADAMS
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blake Barksdale
Defendant:
Seargant Baker, Seargent Cottany, Nurse Alex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver and Jr. Robert Adams
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
