Cases 21 - 30 of 1,628
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis and Stephen E. Toner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Unknow Broward County Sheriff Deputies et al
as 1:2024cv21422
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Unknow Broward County Sheriff Deputies, Unknown Metro-Dade Police Officers, David Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Morgan, IV v. USA
as 24-11151
Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS MORGAN, IV
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE and ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Ricky Johnson v. Kevin Marler
as 24-11060
Plaintiff:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CCA, SHARON LEWIS, THOMAS FERRELL and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Lewis v. Salinas
as 1:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Chaney Lewis
Defendant:
Judge Catherine M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Malloy et al
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Malloy, Capt. Surles, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick Lovett v. Donald Lewis, et al
as 24-10838
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK DEON LOVETT
Defendant:
DONALD ROBERTS LEWIS, STEPHEN E. TONER and UNKNOWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
