Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,115
HUGGINS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner: KINARD DONALD HUGGINS
Respondent: RICKEY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albury v. Davis
as 2:2024cv14203
Plaintiff: SHARRON ALBURY
Defendant: Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant: R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant: WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Lastrina v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11622
Petitioner: DONALD LAWRENCE LASTRINA
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Charles v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Whitney J. Charles
Defendant: Amira D. Fox, Bill Prummell, Patrick Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Buhler v. Department of Corrections, State of Florida
as 24-11440
Petitioner: DONALD LAWRENCE BUHLER
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00918
Plaintiff: Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant: Donald Roberts Lewis and Stephen E. Toner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10975
Plaintiff: RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant: WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Glass v. USP Victorville
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner: Donald Glass
Defendant: USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?