Cases 111 - 120 of 5,360
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. Wolpert et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Leonard English, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher M. Wolpert, David Tighe, Jerome A. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Woodbrook Apartments
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Camillia Williams
Defendant:
Woodbrook Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Boulder Care
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Dana D Williams
Defendant:
Boulder Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Alabama Department of Human Resources Food Stamp Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. City of Jackson, Alabama
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Mary Jackson
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Alabama
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
