Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JACKSON v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 4:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN JACKSON
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JACKSON et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 4:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN JACKSON and US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and LAW FIRM OF DAVID H ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. BANK OF AMERICA NA et al
as 4:2016cv00773
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN JACKSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA and LAW OFFICE OF DAVID H ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION NA et al
as 4:2015cv00491
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN JACKSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION NA and LAW OFFICE OF DAVID H ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of et al
as 5:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Vicky Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of, Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of, Vonda Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tanksley et al v. State of Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 5:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Chasidy Tanksley and Vickey Montgomery
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Birmingham, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ann Jackson
Defendant:
Birmingham, Alabama, City of, Birmingham Police Department, The and Monteuge Minifield
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al v. Chemtura Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv02034
Plaintiff:
Diana Smith, Crystal Power, Lisa Martin and others
Defendant:
Chemtura Corp., Chemtura Corp., Chemtura Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
