Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. City of New Port Richey et al
as 8:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Marlowe Jones
Defendant:
City of New Port Richey, Robert Marlowe, Kim Bogart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
M.A., et al v. Florida State Board of Education, et al
as 23-11016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
M.A., RABBI AMY MORRISON, CECILE HOURY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R. GRADY, BEN GIBSON and others
M.A., et al v. Florida State Board of Education, et al
as 23-10866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.A., S S, RABBI AMY MORRISON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R. GRADY, BEN GIBSON and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
EQUALITY FLORIDA et al v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
EQUALITY FLORIDA, FAMILY EQUALITY, M A and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R GRADY and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feagin v. Chinn et al
as 1:2016cv24346
Plaintiff:
Destini Feagin
Defendant:
Marlin Chinn , Mark B Rosenberg, Pete Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Hill
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Office, Jack Long, Barbara Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricketts v. Arch et al
as 2:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ricketts
Defendant:
Denise Arch, Ronald Arch, Deneige Arch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1456 U.S. Housing Authority action re slums/urban renewal
Ricketts v. Arch et al
as 2:2007mi00007
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ricketts
Defendant:
Denise Arch, Ronald Arch, Deneige Arch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1456 U.S. Housing Authority action re slums/urban renewal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
