Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brittian et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brittian and Rest Ya Head Realty LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Leslyn Medina-Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Blackburn v. McPhail et al
as 5:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
DeCharla Danielle Blackburn
Defendant:
Kent D McPhail, Jason A Tatum, Jeffrey Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlowe v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01829
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sally Marlowe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Rentz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 17-13058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. RENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Rentz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 5:2016cv01645
Plaintiff:
James E. Rentz
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Costa v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv23821
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Costa
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Roy Hallak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bodmann et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
James Bodmann and Lucille Bodmann
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, M & T Bank Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv03315
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Sanders
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02685
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
TRESCOTT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 4:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
CAROL TRESCOTT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
