Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SHARBAUGH v. BEAUDRY et al
as 3:2016cv00126
Defendant:
JOHN C BEAUDRY , JACOB R DENMON , RICKY J DUFRENE and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL K SHARBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY M SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and BRIAN HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. St. Vincent's Medical Center Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Samson Carr
Defendant:
St. Vincent's Medical Center Inc. and Travis M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reed v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shirley Reed
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, Dennis Blankinchip, Michael Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2012cv01194
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Reed
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, Steve A. Zona, Dennis Blankinchip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Blount County et al
as 2:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Blount County, Sherry Burns, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Alabama Supreme Court et al
as 2:2010cv03050
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Snodgrass Caffey
Defendant:
Alabama Supreme Court, Sue Bell Cobb, Champ Lyons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOWE v. SMITH
as 3:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPPI S LOWE
Defendant:
ELOISE M SMITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Faller v. McAdams et al
as 9:2007cv80652
Plaintiff:
James S. Faller, II
Defendant:
James G. McAdams, III, United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"); and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert v. Garrett et al (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00625
Plaintiff:
Hewitt P. Robert, Jr.
Defendant:
James Garrett, Sue Bell Cobb, Frend See, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
