Housing/Accommodations Cases filed in North Carolina matching "S"
Cases 21 - 30 of 840,518
Ezzell v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00513
Defendant: Navilyst Medical, Inc. and Angiodynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Simpson Ezzell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2024cv01678
Defendant: John W. Mina, Dennis M. Lemma, Sanford Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Jamie C. Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02202
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Greyhound Bus Inc.
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Hill
Defendant: Greyhound Bus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04179
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Clay v. Darragh et al
as 1:2024cv04171
Defendant: District Attorney Lee Darragh and Sheriff Jeff Johnson
Plaintiff: Kenneth Wayne Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv04191
Defendant: Office S. Thomas, Warden of Fulton County Jail and Patrick Pat Labbot
Plaintiff: Israel Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08583
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08596
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08600
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?