Cases 121 - 130 of 56,374
Zucallo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County)
as 8:2024cv01191
Petitioner:
James Zucallo
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Lastrina v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11622
Petitioner:
DONALD LAWRENCE LASTRINA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 7:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
CHARLES A PASCHAL, JR
Respondent:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxton v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Terry Saxton
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARD v. SULSBERRY
as 4:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
BRANDY LEE WARD
Respondent:
SULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kenley, Michael v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80645
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Kenley
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sylvester v. Rowlins (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv01199
Petitioner:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimore v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv02159
Petitioner:
Roy Latimore
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
