Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Curtin v. State Attorney, Fort Pierce Florida
as 2:2018cv14441
Petitioner:
Lawrence F. Curtin
Respondent:
State Attorney, Fort Pierce Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TERRELL v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), HOLLOMAN, CROSS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Ford et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Lt. Spencer, U/Mgr. Holloman, Librarion Pierce and others
Petitioner:
Willie James Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce Booker v. State of Florida, et al
as 16-11110
Petitioner - Appellant:
PIERCE BOOKER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Pierce v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Dallas Jerome Pierce
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booker v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2015cv20100
Plaintiff:
Pierce Booker
Defendant:
State of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pierce v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01470
Petitioner:
Marco Dewayne Pierce
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Pierce v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-13998
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Edwin Pryor v. Attorney General, State of Ala
as 12-10362
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWIN PIERCE PRYOR
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Chasteen v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv04210
Petitioner:
Leldon Pierce Chasteen
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
