Cases 31 - 40 of 56,467
Hamiter v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough)
as 8:2024cv01334
Petitioner:
Todd Lee Hamiter
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick Lovett v. Hernando CI Warden
as 24-11984
Petitioner:
KENDRICK DEON LOVETT
Respondent:
HERNANDO CI WARDEN
Rickey Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11988
Petitioner:
RICKEY SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
George Martin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 24-11986
Petitioner:
GEORGE MARTIN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gresham v. White
as 1:2024cv02641
Petitioner:
Shelton Gresham
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Bobbit
as 1:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Bradley M. Houston
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Zebranek, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11972
Petitioner:
JAMES D. ZEBRANEK, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Reeves III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01446
Petitioner:
William Morgan Reeves III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Defendant:
Jr. Robert Adams
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
