Cases 61 - 70 of 6,308
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Nash v. F C I - Talladega
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant:
Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maritza v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Claudia Lorza Maritza
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowart v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Cowart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Poux v. Kimberly
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jerome Poux
Defendant:
M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parrish v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Davey Lee Parrish
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama, State of, Etowah County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Mefarlane v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Yohanna Gonzalez-McFarlane
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
