Cases 71 - 80 of 56,266
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Martinez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Castro Castro-Martinez and Oscar Orlando Castro-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corey Bright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10833
Petitioner:
COREY Q. BRIGHT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz, Pavel M. v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv10042
Plaintiff:
Pavel Martinez Ruiz
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELDER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
RICHARD ELDER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEAMER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner:
KERRICK VAN TEAMER
Respondent:
RICKY S DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
