Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 1:2024cv21068
Plaintiff:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL
Defendant:
Robert Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 4:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL and JABBAAR MUJAAHID ABDUL
Respondent:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STARKS v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DONNELL STARKS
Respondent:
D PARKS WHITE, HARVEY WASSERMAN, EARNEST MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Dunn
as 1:2020cv00511
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Conner
Respondent:
Commissioner Jefferson S. Dunn and Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. Benson-Conner et al
as 1:2019cv01866
Petitioner:
Otto Harris
Respondent:
Warden Harmond, Unit Manager Mrs. K. Benson-Conner and Unit Counselor S. Lykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al
as 2:2017cv01980
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Conners
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles , Charles Tipton and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Conners
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles , Charles Tipton and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Conner v. Cynthia Stewart
as 17-10964
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE CONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
CYNTHIA D. STEWART
Willie Conner v. Cynthia Stewart
as 16-16835
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE CONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
CYNTHIA D. STEWART
Conner v. Hanks et al
as 8:2016cv02359
Petitioner:
Darion Conner
Respondent:
Craig Hanks, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
