General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,622
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00291
Petitioner: John Henry Johnson
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner: Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Legros v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11693
Petitioner: JOHN A. LEGROS
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
John Sterling v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11680
Petitioner: JOHN STERLING
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Wrice v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02261
Petitioner: Christopher John Wrice
Respondent: Micheal Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Hunter v. Macon SP Warden
as 24-11659
Petitioner: JOHN A. HUNTER
Respondent: MACON SP WARDEN
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner: Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent: Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner: John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Charles McCrory
Defendant: John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner: JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent: BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?