Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Day v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2022cv01576
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Day
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2022cv00673
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Day
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEE DAY
Respondent:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
El-Elyon v. Ward
as 1:2020cv02391
Petitioner:
Dai-Juan Taikain El-Elyon
Respondent:
Timothy C. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNOWDEN v. DOE
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Defendant:
JOHN I WALTON, KEITH DAY, LENA WREN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Day v. Calloway et al
as 6:2019cv00905
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Calloway
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lawson Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAY v. JONES
as 3:2018cv01506
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Petitioner:
ALLAN RAY DAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Day v. Dunn et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gary Day
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Crow and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dai v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv60518
Plaintiff:
Licheng Dai
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren Day v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-10376
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN F. DAY
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
