Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Palmer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11430
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD PALMER
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gary v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00808
Petitioner:
James Edward McKinnon, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Burgos
as 2:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillups and James Edward Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2021cv01256
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
James Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lyons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00856
Petitioner:
James Edward Lyons
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McInvale v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2020cv00726
Plaintiff:
James Edward McInvale, Jr
Defendant:
Jimmy Thomas and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Bedsole et al
as 2:2019cv01567
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Captain Russell Bedsole
Petitioner:
James Edward Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYD v. LAUGHLIN
as 5:2018cv00470
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BOYD
Respondent:
VANCE LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
