Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lockett v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Donald Dzsan Lockett and Donald D'zsan Lockett
Respondent:
Karen Williams and State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aljay Lockett, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 17-13480
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALJAY LOCKETT, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Richard Kennedy v. John Lockett, et al
as 17-11023
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD D. KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. LOCKETT, JOSEPH HEADLEY, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III and others
Kennedy v. Lockett et al
as 1:2017cv00028
Petitioner:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Respondent:
John R. Lockett, Joseph Headley and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Lockett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Defendant:
John R. Lockett, Joseph Headley and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOCKETT v. WARDEN
as 7:2016cv00068
Petitioner:
GARY LOCKETT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gadson v. Lockett (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Chedrick Dion Gadson
Defendant:
Charles L. Lockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curt Lockett v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-10877
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURT MARQUAIN LOCKETT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lockett v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv81656
Plaintiff:
Curt Marquain Lockett
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Flordia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01836
Petitioner:
Charlie Lockett
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
