Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barber v. Dunn
as 5:2016cv00473
Petitioner:
James Edward Barber
Respondent:
Jefferson F Dunn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clemons v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv02218
Petitioner:
Eugene Milton Clemons, II
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen, Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flowers v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooks v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Hooks
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferguson v. Allen
as 3:2009cv00138
Petitioner:
Thomas Dale Ferguson
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Simmons v. Culliver et al
as 2:2008cv00419
Petitioner:
Clarence L Simmons and Clarence L Simmons
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2007cv00518
Petitioner:
Jimmy Davis, Jr, Jimmy Davis, Jr, Jimmy Davis, Jr and others
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Happ v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv00074
Petitioner:
William F. Happ and William F. Happ
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Wood v. Campbell et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2004cv00509
Plaintiff:
Holly Wood
Defendant:
Donal Campbell , Troy King and Grantt Culliver
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
