Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 401
Williams v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00093
Defendant: Warden Terrence Kilpatrick and Commissioner Timothy C. Ward
Plaintiff: Walter Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2019cv00175
Plaintiff: TESFA MILLER
Defendant: Warden WALTER BERRY, GREGORY C DOZIER and KENNETH MANTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv14371
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections, Adam Gaddie, Remington Walker and others
Plaintiff: Isaac Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant: Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff: Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Berry
as 1:2019cv00157
Defendant: Warden WALTER BERRY, CO MOORE, MARY WHEATHER and others
Plaintiff: MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Woods et al (INMATE3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00704
Defendant: Xi Lee and Walter Woods
Plaintiff: Frank Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Dozier et al
as 1:2019cv04404
Defendant: Walter Berry, Kenneth Mantle and Gregory C. Dozier
Plaintiff: Tesfa Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL et al
as 1:2019cv00084
Plaintiff: RICHARD W FOY
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL, Warden WALTER BERRY, DR WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Woods, et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00534
Defendant: Walter Woods and Ms. Peters
Plaintiff: Lampton Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Berry
as 1:2019cv03764
Defendant: Walter Berry
Plaintiff: Marcus Anthony Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?