Cases 31 - 40 of 397
Sherrill v. Carter et al
as 8:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Niketa Lashun Sherrill
Defendant:
Kyle Carter and Emanuel Oropesa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Kendell Letroy Carter
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith, Amira Fox and Ashley Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
CARTER v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
DESMOND CARTER
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Duncan et al
as 6:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Stacy A. Scott
Defendant:
Daiquiri D. Duncan, Matthew Harper, Steven E. Frybarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gerald James Carter
Defendant:
J. Marshall, Velasquaz and Garmman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. DeKalb County Jail
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Steven Carter
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
