Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. SHAVER et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES, UNIT MANAGER NATALIE MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
FLOYD v. MALONE, et al.
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III
Defendant:
MS MALONE, OFC THOMPSON, Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Malone et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Malone, Officer Thompson, Mrs. Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. PEPER et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PEPER, UNIT MANAGER D JONES, NURSE WRITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Danny Dwayne Malone
Defendant:
Sergeant Kenyon Jackson, Marietta Police Department and City of Marietta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarley v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Gary Malone, Antoine Price, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
John McCarley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00555
Defendant:
Darryl Robinson, Gary Malone, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
