Cases 161 - 170 of 34,117
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson, Vanerren v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv14159
Plaintiff:
Vanerren E. Robinson and Vandareen E. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden and Z. Culpepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens, Kevin v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv21941
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Owens
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Warden Acosta, Warden Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholston v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Deante Gholston
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Medical Director of GDC and Dr. Ditslear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelvin Frazier v. S. Esson, et al
as 24-11654
Plaintiff:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant:
S ESSON, Martin Correctional Institution, R BYNER, Martin Correctional Institution, D HAWLEY, Martin Correctional Institution and others
MCKENZIE v. CREWS
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
KEVIN CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
DENZEL EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
C T HUGHES, K PERKINS, S SPEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris Anderson, Jr. v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2024cv60847
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff's Office and Unknown Broward County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
