Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Shingleton v. Anderson et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Asst. DA Daffney Black, Atty Chief Council Steven Yekell and others
Plaintiff:
Isiah Shingleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WARD et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II
Defendant:
Head Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS, Head Warden REAGAN BLACK, Commissioner TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, Stephanie Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. SPRAYBERRY et al
as 4:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Judge Beasley, SERGEANT TIPTON, Sprayberry and others
Plaintiff:
Recardo Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. SPRAYBERRY et al
as 5:2019cv00264
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT KENNEDY, WARDEN BLACK, SERGEANT TIPTON and others
Plaintiff:
RECARDO HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 5:2019cv00209
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, LEAD NURSE STEPHANIE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv05167
Defendant:
Regional Director, Captain Silva, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHISUM v. BLACK et al
as 6:2018cv00099
Defendant:
Adams, ASSISTANT WARDEN PINERIO and DEPUTY WARDEN SHEENA BLACK
Plaintiff:
WILLIE Q CHISUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHISUM v. BLACK et al
as 5:2018cv00338
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN ADAMS, ASSISTANT WARDEN PINERIO and DEPUTY WARDEN SHEENA BLACK
Plaintiff:
WILLIE Q CHISUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
