Cases 41 - 50 of 484
STEPHENS v. POLISKNOWSKI
as 4:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STEPHENS
Defendant:
JOHN POLISKNOWSKI, YOMRAH WILLIAMS and MICHELLE ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Hardin et al
as 3:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews and Drew
Defendant:
Sergeant E. Hardin and Lieutenant B. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Brown
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ANDREWS
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MURPHY
Defendant:
TRACY ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, CAPTAIN RODRIGEZ, COUNSELOR GERMANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Shepherd
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, St. Johns County, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Gato et al
as 1:2023cv21675
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Jackson Gato, John Doe, T. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipore v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Mwamaratunga Pipore
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Warden Reynolds Fort, Keith Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Nathaniel O'Neal v. Shaunderrick Greene, et al
as 23-11303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL O'NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAUNDERRICK M. GREENE, JUSTIN P. NEEL, EVAN R. MANNERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
